Search the Community: Showing results for tags 'facebook'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • ChainScriptz
    • News
    • Site Updates
    • Add Links
    • Feedback and Comments
  • Miscellaneous
    • Welcome Intro
    • Jokes
    • Chit Chat
    • Radio Stations
    • Hot Picks
    • Test Forum
  • IRC Help and News
    • Scripting Help
    • IRCd Snippets
    • IRCd Chat
    • Chat Networks
    • Eggdrop
    • Script Reviews
    • mIRC Chat
    • IRC Servers & Rooms
    • mIRC Tutorials
    • IRC Clients
  • Tutorials
    • IRC Network Tutorials
    • IRC Client Tutorials
  • Coding Corner
    • WebSite Corner
  • Archives
    • MSN Chat
    • Defunct Chat Networks
    • Gallery
  • Sparkpea
  • Oasiz Chat
  • Phreik Chat
  • Icons & Toolbars
  • Koach.com
  • MTS Themes
  • MSN Old Scriptz
  • New Downloads
  • Support Files & DLL's
  • Vibe SN
  • Maztal
  • Slovenain Scriptz
  • Italian Scriptz
  • Turkish IRC Scriptz
  • Greek Scriptz
  • Script Support Files & DLL's
  • Groups
  • Security Software - Daily Updates
  • Security Programs - Updates
  • General Software - Updates
  • Other Operating Systems - Updates
  • Social Networks
  • Software Reviews
  • Security News and Alerts
  • Virus, Spyware and Trojan Removal
  • Security Bulletins

Categories

  • Buzzen
    • Buzzen Addons
    • Buzzen Archives
  • Sparkpea (ircwx)
    • Sparkpea Scripts (ircwx)
    • Sparkpea Connections (ircwx)
  • Scriptz(IRC)
    • Addons
    • War Scriptz
  • International Scripts(IRC)
    • Greek IRC Scriptz
    • Italian Scriptz
    • Slovenain Scriptz
    • Turkish IRC Scriptz
    • Swedish Scripts
    • Russian Scriptz
    • French Scriptz
  • TCN
  • essential chat
  • Net4110
  • Script Support Files & DLL's
  • IRC Administration Resources
  • IRCd's
  • Server Clients
  • Phoenix Chat
  • Scripting Essentials
  • Phreik Chat
    • Addons
    • Games
  • MSN Archive Scripts
    • MSN Addons
  • Sparkpea Scripts
    • Sparkpea Connections
    • Sparkpea Addons
    • Sparkpea Vincula Scripts
    • sparkpea Trivia & Game scripts
  • Tutorials
  • EggDrop
  • Dlls

Calendars

  • Community Calendar

Found 10 results

  1. Facebook revealed to have stored the passwords of hundreds of millions of users in plain text, including passwords of Facebook Lite, Facebook, and Instagram users. “As part of a routine security review in January, we found that some user passwords were being stored in a readable format within our internal data storage systems.” reads the announcement published by Facebook. “This caught our attention because our login systems are designed to mask passwords using techniques that make them unreadable.” The disconcerting discovery was made in January by Facebook IT staff as part of a routine security review. The passwords were stored in plain text on internal data storage systems, this means that they were accessible only by employees. Facebook quickly fixed the issue and plans to notify the affected users. Facebook estimated that hundreds of millions of people using Facebook Lite, tens of millions of other Facebook users, and tens of thousands of Instagram users are impacted. “To be clear, these passwords were never visible to anyone outside of Facebook and we have found no evidence to date that anyone internally abused or improperly accessed them,” continues Facebook. “In the course of our review, we have been looking at the ways we store certain other categories of information — like access tokens — and have fixed problems as we’ve discovered them,” According to the popular investigator Brian Krebs that is investigating the incident, hundreds of millions of Facebook users had their account passwords stored in plain text and searchable by thousands of Facebook employees. Krebs date some cases back to 2012, anyway he did not find an indication that employees have abused access to this data. Krebs believes that the passwords of between 200 million and 600 million Facebook users may have been stored in plain text, and that over 20,000 Facebook employees may have been able to search those passwords. Krebs cited a senior Facebook employee, who is familiar with the investigation and who spoke on condition of anonymity, that revealed the company is currently investigating a series of incidents regarding employees who built applications that logged unencrypted password data for Facebook users and stored it in plain text on internal company servers. https://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/82728/social-networks/facebook-passwords-plain-text.html
  2. Users tried to upload 1.5 million copies afterwards, but most were blocked. Facebook says a total of 4,000 people viewed the New Zealand mosque shooter's livestream before it was taken down. Less than 200 people were watching during the assailant's live broadcast, according to the social network, none of who reported it. Facebook says the first user report came in 29 minutes after the 17-minute live video started, which was 12 minutes after the livestream ended. The stats form part of Facebook's latest updatedetailing its ongoing response to the sharing of NZ shooting posts. They reveal the small scale reach of the original broadcast but, as we now, that ultimately didn't stop it from being widely circulated around the web. In the wake of the livestream, a version of the video surfaced on YouTubeevery second over the weekend. It was also shared to Reddit forums such as "r/watchpeopledie" and "r/Gore," both of which have since been banned. And Facebook itself scrambled to pull down 1.5 million videos of the incident in the first 24 hours. Meanwhile, New Zealand ISPs including Vodafone, Spark and Vocus were forced to block access at the DNS level to websites that didn't respond to takedown requests. Together they cut off controversial messageboards such as 4chan and 8chan (where the shooter was a member and, according to Facebook he shared a link to a copy of the video hosted on a file-sharing site). Worse still, mainstream media like The Daily Mail and Sky News Australia ran excerpts from the shooter's Facebook livestream, forcing Sky New Zealand to pull the latter off air. As usual, Facebook has been transparent in its response. But it's facing a chorus of condemnation from lawmakers worldwide, who've grown tired of its meek attempts at self-regulation. Germany has already set penalties for social media sites that fail to swiftly remove harmful content and the UK is following suit. Though Facebook is pumping more money and manpower into its moderation systems, this latest failure will only result in more scrutiny of its reviews process.
  3. Facebook’s gaming efforts and challenge to Twitch are taking another big leap today, as the social network begins the initial rollout of a dedicated Facebook Gaming tab in the main navigation of Facebook’s app. The goal with the new addition is to help people more easily find games, streamers and gaming groups they follow, as well as discover new content, based on their interests. After clicking the new Gaming tab, there will be a feed of content that points to instant games you can play with friends; videos to watch from top streamers, esports organizations and game publishers; and updates from your various gaming groups, the company says. The new Facebook Gaming tab builds on the gaming video destination the site launched last year as Fb.gg. That hub had offered a collection of all the video games streaming on Facebook, and a way for gamers and fans to interact. As a top-level navigation item, Facebook’s new Gaming tab will now further extend the gaming hub’s reach. While Twitch and YouTube are today dominating the gaming space, Facebook’s advantage — beyond its scale — is its promise of a reduced cut of transactions. On Fb.gg, gamers were able to attract new fans with the aid of Facebook’s personalized recommendations based on users’ activity, and then monetize those viewers through a virtual tipping mechanism. https://techcrunch.com/2019/03/14/in-a-challenge-to-twitch-and-youtube-facebook-adds-gaming-to-its-main-navigation/
  4. Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp and Instagram users will now be able to send messages to each other, Mark Zuckerberg has announced. The Facebook boss said it will introduce the vast overhaul of the way all of its messaging apps work as part of a move towards being a “privacy-focused platform”. That will include upgrading its encryption and refusing to store data in countries with poor human rights records, he said, as well as rewriting how the various chat apps can talk to each other. https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/zuckerberg-facebook-messenger-whatsapp-instagram-news-a8811126.html
  5. Programming note: It’s time for The Interface to take its annual spring break trip to Austin for South By Southwest! I’ll be interviewing Facebook’s former chief security officer, Alex Stamos, at 2:30 PM local time on Saturday; and Craigslist founder Craig Newmark on 3:30 PM Sunday. If you’re in town, RSVP here and come say hello. The Interface returns March 13th — and in the meantime, I’ll be doing some more original reporting that I can’t wait to share with you. https://www.theverge.com/interface/2019/3/8/18255480/facebook-pivot-privacy-mark-zuckerberg-pr-stunt
  6. Facebook has been overhauling its Messenger app recently, slimming it down to focus more on chat, and promised that it would eventually roll out a dark mode for users. That mode is now rolling out, but there’s a tongue-in-cheek trick you need to do in order to activate it: you have to moon someone. The trick, spotted by Android Police, 9to5Mac, and others, is simple: send someone (or yourself) a crescent moon emoji ( ). Once you do so, a shower of moons appears in the chat window, and you’ll get a prompt to activate the mode in settings. Go to your profile page in the app, and it’ll present you with an option to turn the mode on. https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/3/18248614/facebook-messenger-dark-mode-trick-to-activate-emoji
  7. Facebook will end its unpaid market research programs and proactively take its Onavo VPN app off the Google Play store in the wake of backlash following TechCrunch’s investigation about Onavo code being used in a Facebook Research app the sucked up data about teens. The Onavo Protect app will eventually shut down, and will immediately cease pulling in data from users for market research though it will continue operating as a Virtual Private Network in the short-term to allow users to find a replacement. Facebook has also ceased to recruit new users for the Facebook Research appthat still runs on Android but was forced off of iOS by Apple after we reported on how it violated Apple’s Enterprise Certificate program for employee-only apps. Existing Facebook Research app studies will continue to run, though. With the suspicions about tech giants and looming regulation leading to more intense scrutiny of privacy practices, Facebook has decided that giving users a utility like a VPN in exchange for quietly examining their app usage and mobile browsing data isn’t a wise strategy. Instead, it will focus on paid programs where users explicitly understand what privacy they’re giving up for direct financial compensation. https://techcrunch.com/2019/02/21/facebook-removes-onavo/
  8. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg will finally meet with a representative of the UK government after a UK parliamentary report this week excoriated the social media site for behaving like “digital gangsters.” According to The Guardian, the UK’s culture secretary Jeremy Wright has flown out this Thursday to Facebook’s headquarters in California to talk with Zuckerberg in person. The Facebook CEO has refused repeated requests by the UK Parliament to answer questions in person over issues including misinformation and data privacy. https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/21/18234439/zuckerberg-meet-uk-minister-jeremy-wright-regulations-platforms
  9. Tech titans like Facebook, itself described as a "digital gangster", continually fail to address the risks their platforms pose to democracy – so the British government should regulate, MPs have said. The House of Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee has been conducting an inquiry into "fake news" – which it acknowledged is now an inappropriate moniker – for the best part of two years. The inquiry has involved 23 oral evidence sessions, received more than 170 pieces of written evidence and heard from 73 witnesses – none of whom, to the great frustration of the committee, was Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg. UK Parliament roars: Oi! Zuck! Get in here for a grilling – or you'll get a Tower of London tourREAD MOREThe committee today published its final report, which includes 110 pages of damning criticism of Facebook's attitude to user data privacy and security, the UK's electoral laws and the current state of regulation. In the report, the MPs call for reforms to electoral laws which they say are "hopelessly out of date for the internet age", as well as an independent regulator with statutory powers over social media giants. The document repeated many of the recommendations made in the July interim report, but the main theme is that the government needs to put a stop to tech giants' self-regulation, and rebalance the power between the platforms and the public. A central tenet of this is a compulsory Code of Ethics that requires companies to deal with harmful and illegal content that has been referred to them by users, and content "that should have been easy for tech companies themselves to identify". The MPs also call for greater transparency into online political campaigning – such as a searchable, public repository saying who paid for, sponsored and is targeted by each ad – and investment into digital and data literacy for the public. 'Facebook intentionally broke data privacy laws'Beyond such recommendations are detailed discussions of the Cambridge Analytica saga, covering the many companies brought under that umbrella, including the firm of Leave campaign mega-funder Arron Banks, which have been fined by the UK's data protection watchdog, and – of course – Facebook. Because, while the inquiry started as a probe into the spread of misinformation on the internet, the group was in the right place at the right time to consider the trendy topics of political micro-manipulation and data harvesting. Soon after the scandal broke, Facebook became a prime target for the committee, and Zuckerberg's repeated refusal to give evidence to the group only stoked the MPs' anger, and there are multiple references to this in the report. At one point, efforts to bring him in seemed to reach vendetta levels, with an international committee of parliaments forming just to be rebuffed by the man at the top of the social network and an unprecedented use of archaic Parliamentary powers to seize and later release damaging emails about the Zuckerborg. Summing up his committee's view of Facebook, DCMS Committee chairman Damian Collins said the firm had "deliberately sought to frustrate our work, by giving incomplete, disingenuous and at times misleading answers to our questions". He said firms like Facebook "exercise massive market power" and make money by "bullying the smaller technology companies and developers who rely on this platform to reach their customers" – statements based on the emails the committee released. The MPs also complained that Facebook was "unwilling to be accountable to regulators around the world" – and that the government needed to consider the impact of such monopolies on democracy. However, the report went on to warn that if companies become monopolies, "they can be broken up, in whatever sector" – and noted that its handling of personal data is "prime and legitimate areas" for regulators' scrutiny. And, although the committee is not a legal or regulatory body, it opined that Facebook had "intentionally and knowingly violated both data privacy and anti-competition laws". It also claimed that Facebook had violated the 2011 consent decree established with the US's Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to curtail developers' previously unfettered access to users' information; Facebook was required to obtain consent from users in order to share their data. "The Cambridge Analytica scandal was facilitated by Facebook's policies. If it had fully complied with the FTC settlement, it would not have happened," the report said. The committee called on the Competition and Markets Authority to assess the email cache it released, "to decide whether Facebook is unfairly using its dominant market position in social media to decide which businesses should succeed or fail". Similarly, the Information Commissioner's Office should carry out a "detailed investigation" into the way Facebook offers up access to users' data to other companies, and the committee said it hoped its evidence is beneficial to an investigation underway by the Irish Data Protection Commissioner. The group also reiterated previous calls for the National Crime Agency to investigate connections between Cambridge Analytica sister firm SCL Elections and the newly set-up Emerdata, and for a broader probe into the work of strategic comms firms. "The transformation of Cambridge Analytica into Emerdata illustrates how easy it is for discredited companies to reinvent themselves and potentially use the same data and the same tactics to undermine governments, including in the UK," the report said. "The industry needs cleaning up." Regulator should get access to algorithms, wield hefty finesDelving into the committee's proposals, it wants to tighten liabilities and make tech firms responsible for harmful content posted by users. The Code of Ethics for tech companies – outlined in its interim report – intends to take aim at social media firms' ability to hide behind the fact they claim to be platforms not publishers. The code should set out what constitutes harmful content, and this should include harmful and illegal content that has been referred to the companies for removal by their users and – upping the ante – content "that should have been easy for tech companies themselves to identify". It should be overseen by an independent regulator that has powers to launch legal actions against those that break the code – and to demand access to information relevant to its inquiries. This should include company’s security mechanisms and algorithms to ensure they are operating responsibly. "If tech companies (including technical engineers involved in creating the software for the companies) are found to have failed to meet their obligations under such a Code, and not acted against the distribution of harmful and illegal content, the independent regulator should have the ability to launch legal proceedings against them, with the prospect of large fines being administered as the penalty for non-compliance with the Code." The funding for such regulation and the extra work for the regulator should come from a levy on tech firms, the MPs said. Such proposals fell on deaf ears last time, but the MPs now note that proposals for a digital sales tax "shows that the government is open to the idea of a levy on tech companies". Political campaigningA central part of the work was on political campaigning online, which has received no end of scrutiny amid allegations and evidence of interference from outside entities in various elections. The MPs want to tackle this with "absolute transparency" over political ads online, including "clear, persistent banners" on all paid-for ads and videos that say who the source and advertisers are. There should also be a category introduced for digital spending on campaigns and explicit rules surrounding designated campaigners’ role and responsibilities, the report said. Beyond this, the report stated, the government needs to assess how UK law defines digital campaigning, and acknowledge the role that unpaid campaigns – such as Facebook groups – play in influencing elections and referenda. The committee also said it wants to see new powers for the Electoral Commission, including powers to compel organisations they don’t currently regulate – namely, social media firms – to provide information, and bigger fines, based on turnover, than the existing limit of £20,000. The government should also "put pressure" on social media companies to publicise disinformation and share information about "foreign interference on their sites", which might be who paid for political adverts, who has seen them and who has clicked on them. That pressure is – unsurprisingly – proposed as "the threat of financial liability if such information is not forthcoming". 'Big tech must not expand exponentially'The committee is not naive in thinking that it can change the internet: it acknowledged that the situation in which platforms coarsen discourse, distort views and polarise debate will not change – and that nations have always faced propaganda masquerading as news. However, its argument is that the companies that operate in this field can, and should, be better regulated. Crucially, the committee is seeking greater transparency – for instance on the sources of information – and accountability. Facebook makes money by selling access to users' data through ad tools, and increases that value by offering up reciprocal data-sharing deals with app developers and by seeking to extend its grip on the public - MPs want these practices to be subject to more policing. "The big tech companies must not be allowed to expand exponentially, without constraint or proper regulatory oversight," they said. "But only governments and the law are powerful enough to contain them. The legislative tools already exist. They must now be applied to digital activity, using tools such as privacy laws, data protection legislation, antitrust and competition law." ® by: https://www.theregister.co.uk
  10. Facebook is reportedly working on a digital currency to enable money transfers on its messaging service WhatsApp. The social network has plans to launch its cryptocurrency in India first to benefit from the countries growing mobile payments market, according to a new report. The news comes just months after Facebook revealed plans to launch a blockchain group to study how it could use the technology for a secure online database of transactions. Blockchain, also known as distributed ledger technology, is a shared database that provides a public record of changes in the ownership of an asset, such as a cryptocurrency. Facebook's blockchain team, led by former PayPal executive David Marcus, is believed to be working on plans for a WhatsApp "stablecoin" - a cryptocurrency similar to Bitcoin that would be pegged to the US dollar to reduce volatility.  The plans for a cryptocurrency are in the early stages, according to people familiar with the matter speaking to Bloomberg. A Facebook spokesman said: "Like many other companies, Facebook is exploring ways to leverage the power of blockchain technology. This new small team is exploring many different applications. We don’t have anything further to share." So-called stablecoins are online tokens designed to match the value of real-world current, meaning they can be used to send payments.